Atlas Pulse · · 4 min read

Gold’s 43% IRR

Disclaimer: Your capital is at risk. This is not investment advice.

Atlas Pulse Gold Report Issue 108;

Gold remains overbought, and a consolidation would be the best outcome we can hope for. The best bull markets are long-lasting.

The great crash in the gold price didn’t last long. My last issue of Atlas Pulse was written on 8th October, when gold closed at $4,042. My caution was that the price of gold was 25% above its 200-day moving average, which was extended. By the 20th of October, the price closed at $4,356, which was 33% above the trend. That’s a big number, and a correction promptly ensued.

Gold Price Deviation from Trend

Source: Bloomberg

Remarkably, that correction turned out to be mild, with the gold price falling by just 10%. Still, the price of gold remains 25% above trend, which is elevated.

There’s also the trend itself to consider. The post-2023 rally has been rising at an annualised rate (or internal rate of return, IRR) of 43%, which is explosive. Compare that to the 2018 to 2020 rally, which was a more modest 28%. Yet see how in 2020, the final high jumped out of the range before reversing, which we’ll call a blow-off top. That just happened again last month.

Gold Historical Rates of Return – Since 2018

Source: Bloomberg

Bringing in the key gold rallies pre-2011, the initial one from 2001 to 2003 ascended at 16%. Then, 2005/6 saw a brief surge with a 70% IRR trend. The price consolidated for 18 months before sprinting at a 93% pace into early 2008. A brief crash followed during the financial crisis, before a 28% IRR move into the 2011 peak at $1,911. They all seemed to have blow-off tops to some degree or another.

Gold Historical Rates of Return in the 21st Century

Source: Bloomberg

But what about the 1970s?

Read next

Gold and Elton John
Atlas Pulse · Members-only

Gold and Elton John

This year, long-dated government bonds have been selling off, and as that has happened, the price of gold has risen. Gold’s correlation with bonds (prices, not yields) has turned negative for the first time since 2011.